Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Design Patterns in JavaScript: The Singleton pattern

This post about design pattern covers one of the most popular creational patterns, the singleton pattern, and how to implement it in JavaScript.

Intent and Applicability

The intent of the singleton pattern is that only one instance of a specified class exists within a system. Although you could use a global variable as an instance of a class to be accessible globally, it might make sense to let the object itself be responsible for its uniqueness, that means it cannot be instantiated multiple times.

General Concept

The singleton pattern can be implemented within one class. The class uses a unique point of access, the getInstance() method.


   


To make this happen the implementation must prevent the class to be instantiated via a new statement, e.g. var newObj = new SingletonClass());

Implementation

The concept can be implemented in this way:

function SingletonClass() {

 if (SingletonClass.caller != SingletonClass.getInstance) {
  throw new Error("SingletonClass can only be accessed by getInstance() method.");
 } // Prevent class from being called by anything else than getInstance()

 var _instance = null;
 var singletonData = "ABC";

 this.getSingletonData = function() {
  return singletonData; 
 };

 this.setSingletonData = function(newValue) {
  singletonData = newValue; 
 };

}

SingletonClass.getInstance = function() {
 if (this._instance == null) {
  this._instance = new SingletonClass();
 }

 return this._instance;
}

The heart of this implementation is the getInstance() function. The first time it is called it instantiates a new object and assigns the (private) variable _instance to it. The other core part of the implementation is the constructor of the class. It checks if the caller is something else then the class itself. In this case the class is not being generated. The result is the behavior that the class is being instantiated only once during the first call to getInstance().

Detailed Discussion

A more detailed theoretical discussion on the singe pattern can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

CQRS - Command Query Responsibility Segregation

A lot of information systems have been built with a data manipulation focus in mind. Often CRUD (create, read, update delete) operations built on top of a predefined relational data model are the first functionalities that are implemented and lay out as a foundation for the rest of an application. This is mainly because when we think about information systems we have a mental model of some record structure where we can create new records, read records, update existing records, and delete records. This had been learned throughout the last decade of data centric and transaction oriented IT systems. This approach often leads to shortcomings when it comes to query and analyze the system's data. Classical layered architecture This is where CQRS comes into the game. CQRS stands for Command Query Responsibility Segregation and has been first described by Greg Young and later on by Martin Fowler. This architectural pattern calls for dividing the software architecture into two parts

Create a Bearer token in Scala

Bearer tokens are a standard which is used in OAuth 2.0 . Although there have been discussions if the security mechanisms are significantly weaker than the use of using signatures as many implementations of OAuth 1.0 did (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-00 ), bearer tokens are part of the OAuth 2.0 specification and therefore widely adopted in nearly all implementations. The syntax of Bearer tokens is specified in RFC6750 ( http://http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6750 ) This is a lean utils object to create specification compliant Bearers in Scala using the java.security.SecureRandom implementation as a randomizer. The standard generate function returns a token of 32 byte length. A second polymorphic functions allows for the generation of a token of individual size. import scala.util._ import java.security.SecureRandom /* * Generates a Bearer Token with the length of 32 characters according to the * specification RFC6750 (http://http://tools.ietf

Moore's Law and Amdahl's law

Until the mid oft he 2000’s, there was some kind of an unbreakable fact regarding the vertical scalability of computer hardware and therefore the underlying scaling rules for computer software: Moore’s law. Moore’s law states that the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years. In good old times of single core processors this meant that also the computing power doubled by this effect. This was a safe harbour for gaining performance in software development. The time was with you, you just had to wait and your execution was getting faster without any changes in the software architecture. Moore’s law is still a valid rule of thumb, but times for the software developers and architects have changed. Although the number of transistors is still growing rapidly, this results in more processor cores since the mid of the 2000’s which means a shift of the vertical scaling approach to horizontal scaling. This also means to gain a positive impact from micro